I agree too, that we shouldn't neglect Military advancements and investments, but I do doubt our ability to win any attack to take over Singapore.Originally posted by dragg:i agree with everyone that we need to spend on defence.
but how much is enough? are we overspending?
frankly i have a feeling that the kind of weapons we buy are mostly to elevate our status. nothing to do with the real defence.
if ever any agressors were to make this attempt, let none of them be able to plunder our remainding resources...a barren waste land they will get as the spoils of war. our own demise for the deepest bite we can drive with our fangs on their flesh before we die. if every sgreans were to die fighting to the end its the only best thing we can write over our graves to be proud of...yet i guess this day will not come...with all these negative comments and suggestions on removing military spendings, i bet most would have fled or joined the other side upon the first chance.Originally posted by ShutterBug:I agree too, that we shouldn't neglect Military advancements and investments, but I do doubt our ability to win any attack to take over Singapore.
I believe the most powerful weapon our country can have, are the Social Skills that our leaders possess.
No country in the world would admit they will be aggresor. Name me a country which has a Ministry Of Aggression...Originally posted by dork3d:Me remembered when me was serving my NS, we were taught that we will never be the aggressor and why we were trained in such a manner according to various doctrines is because we would want any aggressors that have the thoughts of attacking Singapore to pay a hefty price, even SAF knows we will lose any war...
ya but I'm doing a army kinda comparison...Originally posted by mhcampboy:but there isnt SAF during WW2....![]()
![]()
lol .. you think sg soldiers are well prepared?Originally posted by monoslayer:if the threadstarter is an army regular like he claimed, he should all the more noe how impt is building up the defence of sg.. i m amused tat tis thread even exist..
tats a chinese saying "yang bing qian ri, yong zai yi zhao" meaning u train the troops for 1000 days so as to make them well-prepared when the time comes..
if the threadstarter dun understand tis, den i dun c the reason y he need to lock up his house or his car..
at least better den seeking for volunteers to fight a war when the time comes rite?? try giving a M-16 to a guy who was not trained n u c whether he noes wat to do when encounter an IA..Originally posted by Icemoon:lol .. you think sg soldiers are well prepared?![]()
Originally posted by monoslayer:at least better den seeking for volunteers to fight a war when the time comes rite?? try giving a M-16 to a guy who was not trained n u c whether he noes wat to do when encounter an IA..
If someone is not trained, pls dun give him a gun.Originally posted by monoslayer:at least better den seeking for volunteers to fight a war when the time comes rite?? try giving a M-16 to a guy who was not trained n u c whether he noes wat to do when encounter an IA..
if u dun armed urself to defend ur own country, who will? wat u cant protect is not urs.. so u wanna stand there n look while the enemies drag ur wife n kids out of ur house??Originally posted by Icemoon:If someone is not trained, pls dun give him a gun.
You know the danger of blurring the civilian and soldier role? The enemy will not hesitate to shoot anyone, because there is no telling who is a solider and who is not.
You just look forward for POP first ok.Originally posted by borntolive:i doubt present soliders trained by SAF will be willing to fight for our own ctry..
Everyone in army is lookig foward to ORD only
hi borntolive! i tot u suppose to b in tekong liaoz??Originally posted by borntolive:i doubt present soliders trained by SAF will be willing to fight for our own ctry..
Everyone in army is lookig foward to ORD only
why will they drag civilians out of the house?Originally posted by monoslayer:if u dun armed urself to defend ur own country, who will? wat u cant protect is not urs.. so u wanna stand there n look while the enemies drag ur wife n kids out of ur house??
Well, we certainly dun get to see or handle much high-tech weaponry during our NSF days, especially if one is still a trainee or is posted to reserve units. As a basic foot soldier, it would be hard to equip everyone with all the latest gear. Our defence expenditure is high by regional standards but still small as compared to many countries. Priority has to be given to the procurement of advanced equipment such as Apache attack helicopters, long range artillery, French designed stealth warships and new missiles ranging from anti-tank to anti-ship, amongst a host of other major equipment, both classified and unclassified. There would not be much money left for improving basic equipment after these purchases. However we certainly do not want our common soldiers to be staring down the barrels of our adversaries' tanks and warplanes with only assault rifles do we? Steps however have been taken recently which are encouraging such as new boots, helmets and personal kit which will be issued within the next few years.Originally posted by acwire_2125:WEll, since the government is spending so much on the SAF, how come the soliders do not get excellent gear like their conuterparts in the USA? Much Gear that we are using now are also old or out dated. We could also make do with better personnel issued gear like boots, helmet and other stuff.
Ya, it's very ironic. On one hand, I wouldn't want a war to break out but on the other hand, there's no real chance to prove that I'm a useful person.Originally posted by monoslayer:if the threadstarter is an army regular like he claimed, he should all the more noe how impt is building up the defence of sg.. i m amused tat tis thread even exist..
tats a chinese saying "yang bing qian ri, yong zai yi zhao" meaning u train the troops for 1000 days so as to make them well-prepared when the time comes..
if the threadstarter dun understand tis, den i dun c the reason y he need to lock up his house or his car..
When there is open warfare, all kinds of atrocities will be committed. Be it rape, for use as hostages or as human shields, robbery or just plain sadistic murder, u can be sure it will happen. The UN will deal will such problems too late as always. I have not once seen any example of a well-behaved invading country.Originally posted by Icemoon:why will they drag civilians out of the house?
you mean they attack us because of our pretty ladies and cute schoolgirls?
on the contrary, during the Japanese Occupation, they did dragged people out of the house - to flush out anti-Jap elements.
I know how u feel, but as long as we continue to enjoy an additional day of peace u can be sure u are doing a fine job. Dun let some hostile or snide opinions get the better of u. Its not healthy.Originally posted by SharkBoy87:Ya, it's very ironic. On one hand, I wouldn't want a war to break out but on the other hand, there's no real chance to prove that I'm a useful person.
It's like doing patrol.... Walk here, walk there but nothing happen, so people start to think....... why are these people here for? Waste money only.... dogs cheaper..
i dunno whether u acting blur or u really ignorant.. go ask ur elders who survived WWII n listen to their tales.. go do research on the nanking massace icident oso..Originally posted by Icemoon:why will they drag civilians out of the house?
you mean they attack us because of our pretty ladies and cute schoolgirls?
on the contrary, during the Japanese Occupation, they did dragged people out of the house - to flush out anti-Jap elements.
Originally posted by monoslayer:i dunno whether u acting blur or u really ignorant.. go ask ur elders who survived WWII n listen to their tales.. go do research on the nanking massace icident oso..