should teachers be allowed to punished harshly in school?
-
the teachers shld make the students stand under the palm tree bare-footed...tat will help improve their blood circulation...:)
-
You can see this kind of things may be even harder lot in India !
-
They should. Kids these days are getting out of hand.
-
Originally posted by despondent:
the teachers shld make the students stand under the palm tree bare-footed...tat will help improve their blood circulation...:)
despondent: hahaha ... this is a good reason. I remembered once the discipline mistress read out a list of boys' names and said that they were caught by prefects for visiting the canteen in the nearby primary school and they would have to keep the palm tree acompany by standing under it for a week. She seemed to like this punishment a lot. Very often, the boys who stood under the palm tree were seen picking up and threw the pebbles when they got bored. Soon after, another young female relief teacher learnt about this punishment and threaten to punish us this way if we were caught doing other things during her lesson. Haha -
Hey despondent:, How is your friend (the one who punished her students to stand tiptoe) doing now? Where is she teaching? Long time never heard about her.
-
wah kaoz...
teacher's these days must la..
I see the gin nas these days getting more and more sia suay.
go BMT wanna swim back.
all ccb spoilt to the max.
-
to snoopy81,
she is still teaching primary school which is wad she wants...she likes mingling wif kids of tat age and so doesnt want to move up to teaching secondary school...
-
saw this on youtube. seems like school punishments in singapore are indeed very slack...this primary 4 student was punished until he cried...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JCVHTCtT74&feature=related
-
Child discipline should be done in a genderless manner. Regardless of the teacher's gender, girls should not be treated better than boys. Otherwise, girls turn into Xinyi and boys end up like Chen. Trust me, any rational-minded, mature expert on child psychology would agree. Stop doing what's politically-correct and start doing what's logically-correct.
I am a biology major and a radical feminist. Feminists and women usually agree that children should NOT be treated on a gender-differential basis. It's the macho men -- such as Jiani -- who strongly believe in horrific ancient gender roles.
I personally -- and from a scientific standpoint -- feel it is wrong for society to force a male of any age to treat a girl-child "better" than a boy-child of the same age if/when such treatment is provided solely based on the gender of the children.
By "better" I mean one or more of the following:
1. More compassion
2. More sympathy
3. More respect
4. More gentleness
5. More easiness
6. More empathy
7. More cleanliness
8. More protection
9. More luxury
10. More personal space
11. More privacy
12. More security
13. More freedom
14. More modesty
15. More decencyOn average, the adult woman:
1. Is physically weaker than the adult man
2. Is more emotional than the adult man
3. Is better behaved than the adult man
4. Is far more likely to be a victim of opposite-gender violence [e.g. violence may be sexual, domestic, or spousal abuse] than the adult man
5. Can get or be pregnant whereas the adult man can't
6. Is physically more delicate than the adult man
Also, it is likely natural for a man to want to treat an adult woman partially over an adult man -- this is seen in many mammalian species. For example in many species of large mammals -- such as bison --, the adult males are rough with each other but tender with the adult females.
Thus, I believe males of all ages should treat adult women "better" than adult men. This will also give men/boys a respect for adult women and will help prevent these males from perpetrating domestic violence against their wives and girlfriends. However, males -- of any age -- should never be taught to treat girl-children better than boy-children because this will cause boys to develop an intense and life-long hatred for young girls and a hatred for the macho men who teach these boys to defer to girls. This sexism against boy children will likely cause boys to also despise society and it's irrational norms.
The average girl is no more weak, innocent, well-behaved, delicate, vulnerable, or sensitive than the average boy of the same age.It is due to the pro-girl sexism -- perpertated in public by the men of society -- that I don't want to have any children. I don't want my potential son being brutalized by society just because he is a boy -- like Chen. I don't want my potential daughter turning into a vile monster -- like Xinyi -- who goes out of her way to mistreat boys just because she knows she'll get away with it.
Boy = male who is under 18 years of age
Woman = female who is 18 years of age or older
Man = male who is 18 years of age or older
Girl = female who is under 18 years of age
I've probably said this before and I'll say it again...
...Women -- both in public and private -- usually treat children in a genderless manner. Men, however usually treat girls "better" than boys -- especially in public. The macho men of society are causing the issues that lead to the unfair empowerment of girls and abuse of boys.
Boys are sugar and spice
Girls are turtles and snakes
-
eh how is this related to the thread?
-
Originally posted by despondent:
eh how is this related to the thread?
It's relevant, because...
Male teachers often treat girl-children better than boy-children
Female teachers, on the other hand, treat children in a genderless manner.
I support the gender-free method used by female teachers.
-
u mean the female teacher's method in general or the method used in the case shown in the video clip?
-
Originally posted by despondent:
u mean the female teacher's method in general or the method used in the case shown in the video clip?
In general.
-
Last time my secondary school allowed caning in public for serious offences like molest.
I approve of this type of punishment for students.
-
Originally posted by Dalforce 25:
Last time my secondary school allowed caning in public for serious offences like molest.
I approve of this type of punishment for students.
Approved or not, children should still be treated in a genderless manner.
If a girl mistreats a boy, she should publicly-face the same disciplinary action he would publicly-face for mistreating her -- regardless of the gender of the adults performing the discipline.
As I've said before, I'm a biology student and a radical feminist. I don't buy into the gender stereotype that "girls are weaker and less mischevious than boys". Up to the age of 18, children should NOT be treated on a gender-differential basis. However, I make ONE -- and only ONE -- exception to this rule:
Males of *all* ages *should* treat adult women "better" than adult men. However, males -- of any age -- should *never* be made to treat girl-children 'better' than boy-children.
18 is a the magic age at which a child instantly transforms an adult. Below 18, a human being is a child. 18 or above, he/she/it is an adult.
-
Originally posted by Warm hearted man passive:
Approved or not, children should still be treated in a genderless manner.
If a girl mistreats a boy, she should publicly-face the same disciplinary action he would publicly-face for mistreating her -- regardless of the gender of the adults performing the discipline.
As I've said before, I'm a biology student and a radical feminist. I don't buy into the gender stereotype that "girls are weaker and less mischevious than boys". Up to the age of 18, children should NOT be treated on a gender-differential basis. However, I make ONE -- and only ONE -- exception to this rule:
Males of *all* ages *should* treat adult women "better" than adult men. However, males -- of any age -- should *never* be made to treat girl-children 'better' than boy-children.
18 is a the magic age at which a child instantly transforms an adult. Below 18, a human being is a child. 18 or above, he/she/it is an adult.
Don't really agree.
-
Originally posted by Dalforce 25:
Don't really agree.
Mind explaining why you disagree?
BTW, I've said this before and I'll say it again...
Most women agree with me. It's the men who don't.
-
Originally posted by Warm hearted man passive:
Most women agree with me. It's the men who don't.
That is natural. What about women serve NS?
-
Originally posted by Dalforce 25:
That is natural.
Not at all. It is learned behavior.
-
Originally posted by Dalforce 25:
What about women serve NS?
Even these ladies agree, children should be treated in a genderless manner. Again, it's the men who disagree because they've been brainwashed by evil society into protecting girls and bullying boys.
-
ok...peace...we are going off topic...
-
ok
-
This thread has reached 100K view omg?!!!!!
-
Try holding down F5 on other threads....
-
http://v.ku6.com/show/VAl6BJtxFpmT382X.html
Oh man, i cannot imagine such teachers exist...the students wil be scarred for life...click above link for details...