statuatory rape does not include one's will in its context.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:The girl is willing![]()
ya lor..Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:Ya lor. I usually get headach when I see this kind of student-teacher r/s![]()
Correct. Strictly speaking, so long as the girl is a willing partner 16 years of age and above, no laws can be considered to be broken.Originally posted by Pitot:if the girls is 16, it is not statutory.
I agree with wad fudge has said.Originally posted by fudgester:Correct. Strictly speaking, so long as the girl was a willing partner, no laws were broken.
That said though, the teacher had performed a massive breach in the expected professional conduct of teachers. Regardless of whether or not the girl was a willing partner, a clear line should always be drawn between teachers and their students.
Teachers should be educators and mentors to their students, and nothing else.
I call for the removal of this fella from the teaching profession effective immediately.
ya. strongly agree with youOriginally posted by fudgester:Correct. Strictly speaking, so long as the girl is a willing partner 16 years of age and above, no laws can be considered to be broken.
That said though, the teacher had performed a massive breach in the expected professional conduct of teachers. Regardless of whether or not the girl was a willing partner, a clear line should always be drawn between teachers and their students.
Teachers should be educators and mentors to their students, and nothing else.
I call for the removal of this fella from the teaching profession effective immediately.
Exactly.If he liddat get into the pants of a 16 year old gal teenagers in Sg will think its alright and start eff-in gals everywhere.After all, 'If a teacher can do it why cant I? mentality will creep in...'Originally posted by fudgester:Correct. Strictly speaking, so long as the girl is a willing partner 16 years of age and above, no laws can be considered to be broken.
That said though, the teacher had performed a massive breach in the expected professional conduct of teachers. Regardless of whether or not the girl was a willing partner, a clear line should always be drawn between teachers and their students.
Teachers should be educators and mentors to their students, and nothing else.
I call for the removal of this fella from the teaching profession effective immediately.
aiyo, u abusing NPNT ah? buy newspaper la!Originally posted by I-like-flings(m):NPNT or NVNT hor![]()
![]()
![]()
bo straits time here what!!!Originally posted by gigabyte14:aiyo, u abusing NPNT ah? buy newspaper la!
i tink the girl must be a willing party, since she might be curious about sex.
the teacher is so much stronger physically to reject her, still say cannot
the girl is obviously nvr had sex b4 1 la, bluff the teacher...
the girl should be expelled, and the teacher should be fired.
what if the case the other way round?Originally posted by Pitot:You don't eat and sh!t in the toilet.
So you don't work and fark. Or fark with your work.![]()
What u say in forums reflects very well on your low IQ and knowledge. You are very stupid.Originally posted by dragg:statuatory rape does not include one's will in its context.
it is still rape!!