can nitec apply for ns deferment and study poly first?
Originally posted by bryanw:can nitec apply for ns deferment and study poly first?
I'm not sure, but I think can. I already apply my deferment for ITE. But I defer again in poly, isn't the same I still have to go NS, in just a later year, and wasting the same amount of years? ![]()
Originally posted by bryanw:can nitec apply for ns deferment and study poly first?
I guess if haven't reached 19 years old should be ok ... That's what CPIB told me when I transferred poly
Originally posted by ceecookie:Actually, i really apologise if u have any suicide tendencies...
Its just that its very difficult from the start once you have been posted to NT stream.Not even a chance to do O lvl which NA has.Confirm ITE means having a school filled with potential gangsters and classes may not be as peaceful when sometime lecturers cannot even be bothered(gt one thread either here or in HWZ where a lecturer mocked the ITE students for not studying,playing games in school etc)
But i do admit sometime express class does not as good as the Normal stream..heck,my class was super lazy that sometime the best NA class surpassed us in certain case
It doesn't matter whether you have already apologise or not. I just feel very condemmed by what you said, not because I have any suicide tendencies.
In ITE, yes, there's filled with potential gangsters, but they aren't as bad as what you think, you helped them, they will definitely help you more in return (e.g. people find you for trouble and etc..). Class is not peaceful, and is very hard to study in such shit enviroment, I have to agree with that.
But lecturer are not blind or stupid, they got eyes to see who are willing to study. I can always ask for extra lesson if I don't understand one particular topic, or ring him/her up when I'm at home.
Some lecturers can't be bother is because majority of the students are playing with their PSP. Trust me. My class 16 people, 14 play PSP during lesson.
'(gt one thread either here or in HWZ where a lecturer mocked the ITE students for not studying,playing games in school etc)', I would say serve the student right. Why? Simple, because the lecturer is there trying very hard to teach you, but you heck care, and continue to play PSP or play whatever stuff you can find.
Sometime my lecturer mock me, for the sake of fun, because I sometime used to mock my lecturer (like, his hairstyle like Elvis Presley, or trying to act cute). Is how you look at it and how you take the mock/remarks/comments, given by your lecturer.
Hi, while we are actively engaging in this topic, would appeciate if you could continue taking part in this survey
. Thanx
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=N5PL_2fel8mQQmLxXSRA_2bEnw_3d_3d
Originally posted by gunner77:i tink ppl get tis misconception tat express are better than normal
express are taught fast
but tat does not mean tat they learn fast.
whereas normal are taught at a slow pace.
therefore both are equally good.
express where gt fast? farking hell. its damn slow lo. i think secondary sch can b compressed to 3yrs for e top 25% of e cohort. mebbe special stream take 3 yrs,express 4 yrs n normal 5 yrs bah.
however jc ish too fast le , shld b 3 yrs in my opinion.
Originally posted by Chelzea:
express where gt fast? farking hell. its damn slow lo. i think secondary sch can b compressed to 3yrs for e top 25% of e cohort. mebbe special stream take 3 yrs,express 4 yrs n normal 5 yrs bah.
however jc ish too fast le , shld b 3 yrs in my opinion.
Is it?
Both are just nice to me.
Why the heck would I choose a JC if it's 3 years?
Originally posted by gunner77:
i have seen express students retain at sec 3 and still need 5 years to complete secondary school. so is tis wat u mean by "proven themselves capable or handling and learning at that pace through psle ?"
exceptional case mah. wad is e % or express student who take 5 yrs
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
Is it?Both are just nice to me.
Why the heck would I choose a JC if it's 3 years?
i jus find jc life damn hectic. 2 yrs jus fly by liddat. unlike sec sch which seem to stretch on for damn long
My own observation is dat there are more guys den gals in normal stream. can anybody give an analysis of e above observation.
very interesting observation. gals r more serious and reach puberty faster develop faster more matured? whereas guys are more playful puberty slower take things easy?
Originally posted by Chelzea:My own observation is dat there are more guys den gals in normal stream. can anybody give an analysis of e above observation.
Those around me 75% girls 25% boys. Hmm... Maybe after i complete this survey i will draft a new ones. Any more question? ![]()
my fren told me 50% of the gals in normal stream are non virgins.
Originally posted by FirePig:my fren told me 50% of the gals in normal stream are non virgins.
![]()
Originally posted by bryanw:
The reaction that can be seen from the moderator of sgsexforum
hmmm
Originally posted by eagle:The reaction that can be seen from the moderator of sgsexforum
hmmm
i am only one of the mods leh. dont make me sound like so sexpert. i am just contributing back to society. must search for articles to educate abt sex leh. cant just find any tom dick harry article otherwise ppl wont take it seriously. ![]()
Normal stream is for normal people.
Express stream is for kiasu people (most).
Special stream is for kiang gah em si lang.
Originally posted by FirePig:my fren told me 50% of the gals in normal stream are non virgins.
anyway firepig, any idea about the percentage of boys in normal stream who are non virgins? ![]()
Originally posted by bryanw:
anyway firepig, any idea about the percentage of boys in normal stream who are non virgins?
He only checked out the girls I believe ![]()
![]()
![]()
My class ratio for people who really study and people who don't is prolly around 70:30 i think...
I can tell you there will be people whom you wished you could kill them if you are the study type like me...but luckily my class got only a couple of those kind of people...prolly only 3 out of the 34 lol...
Originally posted by eagle:He only checked out the girls I believe
oh yes i forgot no point to really ask about the boys cos their puberty slower. girls develop much faster physically and mentally. ![]()
Actually, im not really condemning ITE totally, in one case i do agree and even recommend ITE should Sec 4 NA students are weak.
Think, because of the way the syllabus is planned for NA, sec 5 contains the majority of it so if the student cannot cope in sec 4 already, better take the ITE route("trade in" the sec 5 for higher NITEC 2 yrs) which have more chance of doing well and then to poly.
Downside is - the bad reputation of ITE - harsh but true reality that will continue unless a revamp is made.
Originally posted by ceecookie:Actually, im not really condemning ITE totally, in one case i do agree and even recommend ITE should Sec 4 NA students are weak.
Think, because of the way the syllabus is planned for NA, sec 5 contains the majority of it so if the student cannot cope in sec 4 already, better take the ITE route("trade in" the sec 5 for higher NITEC 2 yrs) which have more chance of doing well and then to poly.
Downside is - the bad reputation of ITE - harsh but true reality that will continue unless a revamp is made.
Bad reputation?
I think most people find ITE to be a bad place becoz "most" of the students are rotten apples...
But from wot i've seen, where i study, there are loads of ITE students who really study....i think i'm lucky to be in my class...the other class got a a hell load more irritating ass....
Originally posted by fymk:The statements you made are just generalisations and reflect of that rat race lifestyle in Singapore. Ditch the weaker ones while you forge ahead. There are teachers who exhibit this mentality that all normal students are lazy . Unfortunately those same type of two faced teachers I had, are very nice to me now because they know that I am doing wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy well beyond their expectations. I had a principal who wished that we all DON'T DO WELL in our O levels .....slip of the tongue LOL .
I got issues with people portraying your view which is either too naive or too arrogant for its own good. I do agree that indulging in self pity doesn't help but for goodness sakes , we are talking about children and teenagers . They are at stage where patience, encouragement and gentle guidance will help alot. Demoralising them achieve nothing.
We are not talking about adults who should know any better and should bear responsibility for their actions.
Now now u are assuming i am generalising just because of your psersonal bias.Who are you to say your teachers did not want the best for you?teachers are underpaid overworked government civil servants therefore when they do take on this particular profession it is out of passion for helping their students nth more. Therefore it is unfair for you to say that they demoralise and what not because they have no need to do and any basic teachers want the best for their students Na express or NT