1st world country, 3rd world situation, Uniquely Singapore
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
U also have to look back. I am saying tat the needy and old people r taken care of by the gov. However u insist the current practise is not good and wanna give the money to the rich old people as well
It is the tax cheat law. U know the tip top curry puff boss who had to go to jail for cheating the tax ? He claim he made no profit from the store and off to the jail he goes
I think u need to know there r differences bet graduates. Some got first class some got merit some got just pass. U r assuming just because he is a graduate he should have equal job opportunity which is wrong.
Is only about a month where ten thousands people graduate. Give it some time for the market to adjust itself first
R u from the school of NBS ? Because the 90% is based on people from there
When the economy is bad, the FT comes in lesser number.
I have also been around europe and frankly speaking I have faced more rude people there than my years in singapore.
U also have to look back. I am saying tat the needy and old people r taken care of by the gov. However u insist the current practise is not good and wanna give the money to the rich old people as well
In which my argument is that it is more cost effective to give every old folk, including the rich old folks who have had significant contributions to Singapore. You are the one who keep telling me it is already in place when I am telling you they shouldn't have it.
This is a 100% assured safety net for the old folks, not some dubious means testing which also rewards rich old folks who likes to stay in 4rm HDBs.
It is the tax cheat law. U know the tip top curry puff boss who had to go to jail for cheating the tax ? He claim he made no profit from the store and off to the jail he goes
You are comparing to giving a large amount of money to parents whom you should already give, vs employing someone to do nothing. You have yet to raise any law to tell me it is illegal to employ someone to do nothing, and whom can "return" the salary to the boss.
I think u need to know there r differences bet graduates. Some got first class some got merit some got just pass. U r assuming just because he is a graduate he should have equal job opportunity which is wrong.
Job opportunities does not correlate back to results. People with a mindset like yours have lousier job opportunities.
Is only about a month where ten thousands people graduate. Give it some time for the market to adjust itself first
Still the same thing. You raised an article on people being employed months before graduation. And now you are telling me to give the market some time. Make up your mind please.
R u from the school of NBS ? Because the 90% is based on people from there
Glad that you realise the statistic you posted does not refer to the general population.
When the economy is bad, the FT comes in lesser number.
When I came into my engineering company (MNC), including me, there were 5 newcomers. 3 were Singaporeans, and 2 foreigners. The 3 Singaporeans were offered employments at least 1 to 2 years ago, and not the foreigner. In addition, it has been said that they are not hiring any newcomers (to NUS/NTU) at that time.
I have also been around europe and frankly speaking I have faced more rude people there than my years in singapore.
But as a foreigner, and especially if you are working there, were you rude to them? Not to mention that they have their fair share of PRCs, and that they cannot distinguish between you and them. I admit there are nice people from PRC, but not 100% are. Next, PRCs are still considered a minority here, vs you being the minority there in Europe.
It must have costed you a big bomb if you have been around Europe, having claimed you earned <3k a month.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Not true. I have normal friends with 2nd upper honours who till now, cannot find any job
I am not even surprise that the "normal friends" Eagle is referring to is non other then Eagle himself , and thats why he is spending so much time in this forumsI wonder if he is going to start telling us that property price will move in tandem with inflation again.
Anybody want to guess who is this?
2001
What is love? (want to know if he is falling in love)
What do u look for in ur life partners? (want to know how to choose girl)
What do gals do when they show interest? (want to know is any girls like him)
Gals, how would u prefer to be ask out on a date? (Want to learn how to date a girl)
2002
Guys, how wil u choose? (how lian, want to tell other he has choice!!)
How do u tell ur parents you got gf? (planning forward, because he anticipate that he will want to bring gf back to make out)
Love at first sight (still living in his little fantasy)
2007
How would you ask your friend for any sexual activity? (horny bastard want to ask girl for sex)
How much money to do you need to get married? (thinking of getting married when he is still a student? maybe thinking of using marriage to hold on to her gf)
Reasons why you would go for Singles Club outing (want to know if he is the only one looking for sex)
Are you attracted by intelligence (he doesnt have charm and want to know if by studying hard will it attract opposite sex)
It is the fear of rejection (Still struggling, no balls to approach chic)
Reason why there are matchmakers (Trying to find out if there is a need to go to one in future)
Define girly / manly (Some girls must have commented that he is girly)
Being single or attached (asking if being single is ok)
10 Things You Must Know About Fat Loss (Trying to look manly because he is one fat cubby mama's boy)
Lucky Singles Club not Desperate Club (Trying to assure himself he is not desperate)
Supposed you are attached what would you do to hold on to your girl/guy? (GF is leaving him, want to know who to hold her back) -
Originally posted by eagle:
You are comparing to giving a large amount of money to parents whom you should already give, vs employing someone to do nothing. You have yet to raise any law to tell me it is illegal to employ someone to do nothing, and whom can "return" the salary to the boss.
Eagle, Can you show us how employing a Singaporean to do nothing will benefit the company?
-
Originally posted by O o O:
I am not even surprise that the "normal friends" Eagle is referring to is non other then Eagle himself , and thats why he is spending so much time in this forumsI wonder if he is going to start telling us that property price will move in tandem with inflation again.
Anybody want to guess who is this?
2001
What is love? (want to know if he is falling in love)
What do u look for in ur life partners? (want to know how to choose girl)
What do gals do when they show interest? (want to know is any girls like him)
Gals, how would u prefer to be ask out on a date? (Want to learn how to date a girl)
2002
Guys, how wil u choose? (how lian, want to tell other he has choice!!)
How do u tell ur parents you got gf? (planning forward, because he anticipate that he will want to bring gf back to make out)
Love at first sight (still living in his little fantasy)
2007
How would you ask your friend for any sexual activity? (horny bastard want to ask girl for sex)
How much money to do you need to get married? (thinking of getting married when he is still a student? maybe thinking of using marriage to hold on to her gf)
Reasons why you would go for Singles Club outing (want to know if he is the only one looking for sex)
Are you attracted by intelligence (he doesnt have charm and want to know if by studying hard will it attract opposite sex)
It is the fear of rejection (Still struggling, no balls to approach chic)
Reason why there are matchmakers (Trying to find out if there is a need to go to one in future)
Define girly / manly (Some girls must have commented that he is girly)
Being single or attached (asking if being single is ok)
10 Things You Must Know About Fat Loss (Trying to look manly because he is one fat cubby mama's boy)
Lucky Singles Club not Desperate Club (Trying to assure himself he is not desperate)
Supposed you are attached what would you do to hold on to your girl/guy? (GF is leaving him, want to know who to hold her back)Hi, you are new here, care to introduce yourself? You have interesting nick. Do you know eagle before you post here?
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
Hi, you are new here, care to introduce yourself? You have interesting nick. Do you know eagle before you post here?
Are you a clone?
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Are you a clone?
You have not replied me. Don't worry, I am not a clone, you can feel free to reply me. -
Originally posted by Fantagf:
You have not replied me. Don't worry, I am not a clone, you can feel free to reply me.No need talk to trolls one
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Eagle, Can you show us how employing a Singaporean to do nothing will benefit the company?
Eagle, hope you are not going to ignore this question totally. -
Originally posted by eagle:
No need talk to trolls one
Originally posted by eagle:Property goes up in price with inflation. You forgot about that
http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/317706 -
In which my argument is that it is more cost effective to give every old folk, including the rich old folks who have had significant contributions to Singapore. You are the one who keep telling me it is already in place when I am telling you they shouldn't have it.
This is a 100% assured safety net for the old folks, not some dubious means testing which also rewards rich old folks who likes to stay in 4rm HDBs.
The rich old people do contribute to economy, and they get their fair share of profit too. It is the old and needy folks tat need help to survive. To see if they need to get the payment is only a one shot work, after which they get to have payment every month. And the needy old folks probably only take up 10% of the population of old folks. So if we do not establish whether they need help and give money blindly to all folks, then either expect the poor old folks to get 10 times lesser money, or expect a higher tax from the society
You are comparing to giving a large amount of money to parents whom you should already give, vs employing someone to do nothing. You have yet to raise any law to tell me it is illegal to employ someone to do nothing, and whom can "return" the salary to the boss.
As said, it is illegal. U doctored the account, u claim no profit and u evade tax from the company. U make it sounds nicely like giving all profit to an individual and then having the money send back to u but wat is the difference of tat with doctoring accounts ? Tis is tax evasion and tis is a law punishable by the states.
Let me give u a classic example. Durai give 20,000 to a contractor to do nothing. And Durai is in jail now.
Job opportunities does not correlate back to results. People with a mindset like yours have lousier job opportunities.
I already mention the word "generally" many times. People with better results generally get better job opportunity. Tis is common sense
Still the same thing. You raised an article on people being employed months before graduation. And now you are telling me to give the market some time. Make up your mind please.
The article says NBS students. U r not from NBS. How can u compare different things together ?
When I came into my engineering company (MNC), including me, there were 5 newcomers. 3 were Singaporeans, and 2 foreigners. The 3 Singaporeans were offered employments at least 1 to 2 years ago, and not the foreigner. In addition, it has been said that they are not hiring any newcomers (to NUS/NTU) at that time.
So wat is your point ? U r representive the whole society of singapore ?
But as a foreigner, and especially if you are working there, were you rude to them? Not to mention that they have their fair share of PRCs, and that they cannot distinguish between you and them. I admit there are nice people from PRC, but not 100% are. Next, PRCs are still considered a minority here, vs you being the minority there in Europe.
So u felt tat european have the right to be rude while PRC have no right ? There shouldn't be a reason why rudeness need to be differentiated between whether u r the minority or not. Indian r the minority in singapore too. So chinese can be rude and indian have to suck their thumb ?
It must have costed you a big bomb if you have been around Europe, having claimed you earned <3k a month.
The cost is covered by the company
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
The rich old people do contribute to economy, and they get their fair share of profit too. It is the old and needy folks tat need help to survive. To see if they need to get the payment is only a one shot work, after which they get to have payment every month. And the needy old folks probably only take up 10% of the population of old folks. So if we do not establish whether they need help and give money blindly to all folks, then either expect the poor old folks to get 10 times lesser money, or expect a higher tax from the society
As said, it is illegal. U doctored the account, u claim no profit and u evade tax from the company. U make it sounds nicely like giving all profit to an individual and then having the money send back to u but wat is the difference of tat with doctoring accounts ? Tis is tax evasion and tis is a law punishable by the states.
Let me give u a classic example. Durai give 20,000 to a contractor to do nothing. And Durai is in jail now.
I already mention the word "generally" many times. People with better results generally get better job opportunity. Tis is common sense
The article says NBS students. U r not from NBS. How can u compare different things together ?
So wat is your point ? U r representive the whole society of singapore ?
So u felt tat european have the right to be rude while PRC have no right ? There shouldn't be a reason why rudeness need to be differentiated between whether u r the minority or not. Indian r the minority in singapore too. So chinese can be rude and indian have to suck their thumb ?
The cost is covered by the company
The rich old people do contribute to economy, and they get their fair share of profit too. It is the old and needy folks tat need help to survive. To see if they need to get the payment is only a one shot work, after which they get to have payment every month. And the needy old folks probably only take up 10% of the population of old folks. So if we do not establish whether they need help and give money blindly to all folks, then either expect the poor old folks to get 10 times lesser money, or expect a higher tax from the society
Back to the first question I have been asking you: Which is more cost-efficient?
As said, it is illegal. U doctored the account, u claim no profit and u evade tax from the company. U make it sounds nicely like giving all profit to an individual and then having the money send back to u but wat is the difference of tat with doctoring accounts ? Tis is tax evasion and tis is a law punishable by the states.
The account is not doctored; you are still employing someone. And even if you give profit to an individual, you are still liable to tax.
Let me give u a classic example. Durai give 20,000 to a contractor to do nothing. And Durai is in jail now.
Totally no linkage.
I already mention the word "generally" many times. People with better results generally get better job opportunity. Tis is common sense
I have said many times, people with your mindset generally get the worse job opportunities. Not results. Bad results get lousier opportunity because they think like you, that they should be getting a lousier one.
The article says NBS students. U r not from NBS. How can u compare different things together ?
You were the one who brought the article up for comparison and discussion. Now you asking me?
So wat is your point ? U r representive the whole society of singapore ?
I represent the fresh grads this year.
So u felt tat european have the right to be rude while PRC have no right ? There shouldn't be a reason why rudeness need to be differentiated between whether u r the minority or not. Indian r the minority in singapore too. So chinese can be rude and indian have to suck their thumb ?
You still don't understand do you? You go to a foreign country to work, would you be rude to the citizens there? Would you?
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Are you a clone?
Why you ignore me by not replying me? I did not offend you.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Eagle, Can you show us how employing a Singaporean to do nothing will benefit the company?
Eagle, still waiting for your answer on this. -
Eagle, Can you show us how employing a Singaporean to do nothing will benefit the company?
Oh dearie me. I can answer that easily. It will make them happy ya?
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
Eagle, Can you show us how employing a Singaporean to do nothing will benefit the company?
Oh dearie me. I can answer that easily. It will make them happy ya?
I am looking forward to that
-
Originally posted by O o O:
I am looking forward to that
So am I dearie so am I
-
Originally posted by Beautiful951:
So am I dearie so am I
Someone is on mission. -
Back to the first question I have been asking you: Which is more cost-efficient?
Giving the money to the needy. They can get more money for the same budget allocated to them. The lazy method to give the money to everyone is completely a waste. It is like giving all the citizens flu medicine everyday to cure them instead of just giving it to people with flu
The account is not doctored; you are still employing someone. And even if you give profit to an individual, you are still liable to tax.
U see Durai ? He give money to someone for doing nothing (who may actually give him back, who knows) and he goes to jail. If u think the gov is stupid and allow everybody to tax cheat, then u r wrong
Totally no linkage.
Totally the same
I have said many times, people with your mindset generally get the worse job opportunities. Not results. Bad results get lousier opportunity because they think like you, that they should be getting a lousier one.
U r not seeing the matter factually but emotionally. People with better result generally get better job. True or false ? If worse result generally get better job, then I am not gonna study at all
You were the one who brought the article up for comparison and discussion. Now you asking me?
I brought the article but u mis-use it. I direct u to the correct context and then u blame me ?
I represent the fresh grads this year
U found a job
You still don't understand do you? You go to a foreign country to work, would you be rude to the citizens there? Would you?
First, u have not sufficiently prove she is rude to u. Second, people r rude to tourist, who r also customers, who r giving the society money, gonna have a lasting impression of the place, the people which the gov is wooing to come, who will spread the information to other people in his native country, and u think it is okay. Is tis worse then a worker being "rude" to a customer ? Whch side is worse ? It is hard to say
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
Giving the money to the needy. They can get more money for the same budget allocated to them. The lazy method to give the money to everyone is completely a waste. It is like giving all the citizens flu medicine everyday to cure them instead of just giving it to people with flu
U see Durai ? He give money to someone for doing nothing (who may actually give him back, who knows) and he goes to jail. If u think the gov is stupid and allow everybody to tax cheat, then u r wrong
Totally the same
U r not seeing the matter factually but emotionally. People with better result generally get better job. True or false ? If worse result generally get better job, then I am not gonna study at all
I brought the article but u mis-use it. I direct u to the correct context and then u blame me ?
U found a job
First, u have not sufficiently prove she is rude to u. Second, people r rude to tourist, who r also customers, who r giving the society money, gonna have a lasting impression of the place, the people which the gov is wooing to come, who will spread the information to other people in his native country, and u think it is okay. Is tis worse then a worker being "rude" to a customer ? Whch side is worse ? It is hard to say
Giving the money to the needy. They can get more money for the same budget allocated to them. The lazy method to give the money to everyone is completely a waste. It is like giving all the citizens flu medicine everyday to cure them instead of just giving it to people with flu
Do you understand what is the meaning of cost effective? You are now telling me you support spending the extra money to sieve out the needy from the rich old folks instead of distributing this money to the old folks. Not to mention that the method they used gives money to rich old folks staying in 4rm HDBs too => this you made no comments at all.
U see Durai ? He give money to someone for doing nothing (who may actually give him back, who knows) and he goes to jail. If u think the gov is stupid and allow everybody to tax cheat, then u r wrong
Totally the same
Elaborate how it is totally the same when you compare
A charity organisation (who do not need to pay tax) employing an external contractor, paid for, and receive no work done although it is stated on records that there should be work done
vs
A boss employing someone to do nothing, and it is not stated on any records that the person is doing any work; just like there's no records on the exact work you are doing.
U r not seeing the matter factually but emotionally. People with better result generally get better job. True or false ? If worse result generally get better job, then I am not gonna study at all
Not true. I have already said the mindset matters much more. True or false?
I brought the article but u mis-use it. I direct u to the correct context and then u blame me ?
Let's see, you used the article as a support on your argument that the economy is doing well. How is that the correct context?
U found a job
My friends have not. How many people do you know personally that have just graduated?
First, u have not sufficiently prove she is rude to u. Second, people r rude to tourist, who r also customers, who r giving the society money, gonna have a lasting impression of the place, the people which the gov is wooing to come, who will spread the information to other people in his native country, and u think it is okay. Is tis worse then a worker being "rude" to a customer ? Whch side is worse ? It is hard to say
Wow, so you need to prove someone is rude to you. You have not answered my question. Would you be rude to citizens of a foreign country if you are working in that foreign country? If you cannot even settle this simple dilemma in your head, there's no point continuing discussing this part.
-
Eagle, still waiting for you to tell us how a local company can benefit from employing singaporeans to do nothing.
-
Do you understand what is the meaning of cost effective? You are now telling me you support spending the extra money to sieve out the needy from the rich, who aren't a lot to begin wtih. Not to mention that the method they used gives money to rich old folks staying in 4rm HDBs too => this you made no comments at all.
I believed most elderly r not needy with dependents looking after them The proportion of elderly tat need help is probably 10%. And if the elder can afford a 4 room flat, he is not needy. He can use reverse montgage or downgrade to a smaller 1-2 room flat.
Elaborate how it is totally the same when you compare
A charity organisation (who do not need to pay tax) employing an external contractor, paid for, and receive no work done although it is stated on records that there should be work done
vs
A boss employing someone to do nothing, and it is not stated on any records that the person is doing any work; just like there's no records on the exact work you are doing
They r giving money to someone who did not do anything. It does not matter if it is a charity organisation or a family business. There is a dishonest intent to cheat tax here. U pretend to give the money to some bogus workers and tis is cheating
Not true. I have already said the mindset matters much more. True or false
Why is "People with better result generally get better job" not true ?
Your mindset is only useful for the extremely pessimistic people and not generally true for the general population. Now elaborate on your answer
Let's see, you used the article as a support on your argument that the economy is doing well. How is that the correct context?
I use many articles, one of them mentioning about NBS and it is an indication tat job is abundant.
My friends have not. How many people do you know personally that have just graduated?
Do u expect ALL your friends to find job within one month ?
Wow, so you need to prove someone is rude to you. You have not answered my question. Would you be rude to citizens of a foreign country if you are working in that foreign country? If you cannot even settle this simple dilemma in your head, there's no point continuing discussing this part.
I will not be rude under all circumstances. But to u, it seems u can be rude to all minorities in a society and to all tourists because u r a majority in your country.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Eagle, still waiting for you to tell us how a local company can benefit from employing singaporeans to do nothing.
Twinkle twinkle little star
I have told you Do you know
happy is the key to all
but you want another person's say.
twinkle twinkle little star \
how I wonder who you are.
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Do you understand what is the meaning of cost effective? You are now telling me you support spending the extra money to sieve out the needy from the rich old folks instead of distributing this money to the old folks. Not to mention that the method they used gives money to rich old folks staying in 4rm HDBs too => this you made no comments at all.
Eagle, there is a difference between being cost effective and simple minded. Unfortunately, your suggestion is both simple minded and NOT cost effective. It is a complete waste of tax payer money.
-
Originally posted by stupidissmart:
I believed most elderly r not needy with dependents looking after them The proportion of elderly tat need help is probably 10%. And if the elder can afford a 4 room flat, he is not needy. He can use reverse montgage or downgrade to a smaller 1-2 room flat.
They r giving money to someone who did not do anything. It does not matter if it is a charity organisation or a family business. There is a dishonest intent to cheat tax here. U pretend to give the money to some bogus workers and tis is cheating
Why is "People with better result generally get better job" not true ?
Your mindset is only useful for the extremely pessimistic people and not generally true for the general population. Now elaborate on your answer
I use many articles, one of them mentioning about NBS and it is an indication tat job is abundant.
Do u expect ALL your friends to find job within one month ?
I will not be rude under all circumstances. But to u, it seems u can be rude to all minorities in a society and to all tourists because u r a majority in your country.
I believed most elderly r not needy with dependents looking after them The proportion of elderly tat need help is probably 10%. And if the elder can afford a 4 room flat, he is not needy. He can use reverse montgage or downgrade to a smaller 1-2 room flat.
Look at the way they give money to these old folks now. The GST credits/Growth dividends are given mainly by the house they live in. The main question which you have not answered is, is it more cost-effective to give by means testing, or by merely giving every old folk, all of whom has contributed greatly to Singapore's development.
They r giving money to someone who did not do anything. It does not matter if it is a charity organisation or a family business. There is a dishonest intent to cheat tax here. U pretend to give the money to some bogus workers and tis is cheating
1) the worker is not bogus
2) you have hired the person, but that does not mean you need to give him/her anything to do. There's no pretending or anything, and the amount is usually in the 100s, which wouldn't even have amounted to that much tax in the beginning.
3) NKF did not need to pay tax at that time, so there's no tax escaping. The problem was discrepancy between what was stated in the accounts and what was done. Where's the discrepancy here?Why is "People with better result generally get better job" not true ?
Your mindset is only useful for the extremely pessimistic people and not generally true for the general population. Now elaborate on your answer
Because of the word generally. I don't see many of the better educated earning top money. So it is not true generally. Better results do give one an advantage, I'm not denying that. I'm telling you that the mindset (and other characteristics) matter much much more than results.
I find your mindset more suitable for pessimistic people who are already scoring badly. What else can be said for someone who has already admitted he's one who take things as it is.
I use many articles, one of them mentioning about NBS and it is an indication tat job is abundant.
Do you need me to go back to those articles and point out how they do not reflect the current market situation at all?
I will not be rude under all circumstances. But to u, it seems u can be rude to all minorities in a society and to all tourists because u r a majority in your country.
I don't know how you could understand it that way, but by saying you "will not be rude under all circumstances", you should also comment about whether a foreign worker being rude to Singaporeans in Singapore is acceptable.
-
Look at the way they give money to these old folks now. The GST credits/Growth dividends are given mainly by the house they live in. The main question which you have not answered is, is it more cost-effective to give by means testing, or by merely giving every old folk, all of whom has contributed greatly to Singapore's development.
As said, the money should be given to people who really need it, not all old folks. If u want to give to all citizens and ensure they can live by tis amount of money, then u have to expect all working to citizen to give a much larger tax. And I believe tis is geenrally not popular. Although old folks do contribute, they also get their own profit especially the rich one. Why should the poor citizen now get taxed more to support the rich folks ? The gov can use means testing for ALL citizen probably by using a computer program. U think it is difficult to find out the means for only old folks ?
1) the worker is not bogus
2) you have hired the person, but that does not mean you need to give him/her anything to do. There's no pretending or anything, and the amount is usually in the 100s, which wouldn't even have amounted to that much tax in the beginning.
3) NKF did not need to pay tax at that time, so there's no tax escaping. The problem was discrepancy between what was stated in the accounts and what was done. Where's the discrepancy here?1) The definition of worker is to "work". He does not work. Isn't tat already bogus
2) There is such a thing as minimum wages. And it I employ 100 bogus workers, I can claim my company make no profit and do not pay tax. Do u think the Gov (which opposition say tat squeeze everyody dry) will allow such a thing to happen ?
Furthermore your method of cheating the gov is indeed a dishonest means to employ more foreign labourer.
3) The NKF example shows tat giving money to people who do nothing is not an excuse. Do u think Durai can say "I give the contractor money to do nothing" and he will be declare "innocent". For your case, employing people who do nothing is also not an excuse. When u get caught, do u think saying "I employ people to do nothing" stands ?
Because of the word generally. I don't see many of the better educated earning top money. So it is not true generally. Better results do give one an advantage, I'm not denying that. I'm telling you that the mindset (and other characteristics) matter much much more than results.
U mean the one getting no honors can get better job than the first class honours ? Then why people study hard to get first class ? Just face it, if u go to public sector, they already categorized the pay u get depending on the degree u received. Mindset can only help tat much. Only if u r a super pessimistic person then can a change of mindset help. Otherwise no matter how much u think u r the best and get lousy result, u cannot land a good job
Do you need me to go back to those articles and point out how they do not reflect the current market situation at all?
Tis is about FT discussion isn't it ? Doesn't FT come to singapore since many years ago ? If u wanna talk about current market, don't u think it is too early to conclude since people r still convocating ?
don't know how you could understand it that way, but by saying you "will not be rude under all circumstances", you should also comment about whether a foreign worker being rude to Singaporeans in Singapore is acceptable
No, but giving a look is "vague" and shouldn't be classified as a good example of being rude. However u claimed earlier tat majority of the people in the country can be rude (like the french) and they can be rude to tourist which u reply earlier. Why do u think tis is acceptable