Temasek selling Merrill Lynch at a loss
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
There are folks here that do C and F maths, they don't even dare reveal their results.
Then there are those with A & E maths making brandishing his results to the world.
Add in C maths Special Paper
-
Originally posted by freedom4ever:
do note that it is 18 years ago.
Not like the papers 18 years ago are much harder than today
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Listen....since u accuse me of showing off and uses such crude words on me...I shall not refrain myself.
Ur Fuc k ing result in O level shows how much ur intelligence is....ur A math sucks and yet u branch into econs where true economists spend years to polish their mathematical modelling skills.
I am FUC KING telling u that ur STUPID ARGUMENT IS OF WRONG LOGICAL FORM. And because of that u cannot use that to discredit a potential variable. And hence not fair for ppl to swallow ur argument.
Who are u to tell ppl to accept arguments that are flawed logically?? Instead, u should give cases to suggest that certain potential varaibles are wrong, not by the existence of other variables...
If ur argument is logically wrong....I wonder how are u going to convince ppl to invest????
If u wish me to speak to u in a manner of an ah beng ...I am more than capable....show ppl some respect if u want ppl to respect U!!!!!!
1) You dont need to give excuses to use FUCKING in this forum.
2) You keep telling me that my logic is flawed and there are these potential variables. My question to you 5125, what are these potential variables you are talking? How many are there?
Contrary to what you want us to believe, I believe your arguement is logically flawed because you cant back up what you said with FACTS and you will never be able to come out with an equation that can explain how inflation can have a direct impact on property price.
Btw, if FUC KING is a function of STUPIDITY, so based on the no. of fuc king you mentioned above, can I say that you are more stupid than I am?
-
Originally posted by eagle:
Add in C maths Special Paper
You just cant wait to take advantage of this opportunity to show off and glorify your maths dont you?
Why dont you go ahead and show us some of the certificate of acheivement? I am sure many people will be surprise how some multiaward winner could end up telling us that property prices will appreciate inline with inflation.
And lets know forget about
What is love? (want to know if he is falling in love)
What do u look for in ur life partners? (want to know how to choose girl)
What do gals do when they show interest? (want to know is any girls like him)
Gals, how would u prefer to be ask out on a date? (Want to learn how to date a girl)
2002
Guys, how wil u choose? (how lian, want to tell other he has choice!!)
How do u tell ur parents you got gf? (planning forward, because he anticipate that he will want to bring gf back to make out)
Love at first sight (still living in his little fantasy)
2007
How would you ask your friend for any sexual activity? (horny bastard want to ask girl for sex)
How much money to do you need to get married? (thinking of getting married when he is still a student? maybe thinking of using marriage to hold on to her gf)
Reasons why you would go for Singles Club outing (want to know if he is the only one looking for sex)
Are you attracted by intelligence (he doesnt have charm and want to know if by studying hard will it attract opposite sex)
It is the fear of rejection (Still struggling, no balls to approach chic)
Reason why there are matchmakers (Trying to find out if there is a need to go to one in future)
Define girly / manly (Some girls must have commented that he is girly)
Being single or attached (asking if being single is ok)
10 Things You Must Know About Fat Loss (Trying to look manly because he is one fat cubby mama's boy)
Lucky Singles Club not Desperate Club (Trying to assure himself he is not desperate)
Supposed you are attached what would you do to hold on to your girl/guy? (GF is leaving him, want to know who to hold her back) -
Originally posted by O o O:
1) You dont need to give excuses to use FUCKING in this forum.
2) You keep telling me that my logic is flawed and there are these potential variables. My question to you 5125, what are these potential variables you are talking? How many are there?
Contrary to what you want us to believe, I believe your arguement is logically flawed because you cant back up what you said with FACTS and you will never be able to come out with an equation that can explain how inflation can have a direct impact on property price.
Btw, if FUC KING is a function of STUPIDITY, so based on the no. of fuc king you mentioned above, can I say that you are more stupid than I am?
You totally enjoy coming here to get thrashed don't ya ?
Do you feel good about being the clown of SGforum ?
Seriously dude.. are your parents aware of this problem of yours ?
-
Originally posted by jojobeach:
You totally enjoy coming here to get thrashed don't ya ?
Do you feel good about being the clown of SGforum ?
Seriously dude.. are your parents aware of this problem of yours ?
Thats only if trash like you can ever differentiate what is trash and what is facts. -
I Am Above Failure: So you think that you are somehow far too talented, hard-working or knowledgeable and that everything you touch will turn into gold? Sorry to burst your bubble there, but we humans are flawed by nature so that, my friend, I?m afraid that you may just be living in denial if you have such a way of thinking.
Everyone Else is Wrong: Are all of the people who don't agree with you clueless? Are they that ignorant, can't they understand your brilliance? I'm sorry but, if that's the way you see things, I am afraid that the problem lies elsewhere. One tip: it's not with everyone else.
source: http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/322192
-
Back to personal attacks and repetitions.
-
Originally posted by freedom4ever:
I Am Above Failure: So you think that you are somehow far too talented, hard-working or knowledgeable and that everything you touch will turn into gold? Sorry to burst your bubble there, but we humans are flawed by nature so that, my friend, I?m afraid that you may just be living in denial if you have such a way of thinking.
Everyone Else is Wrong: Are all of the people who don't agree with you clueless? Are they that ignorant, can't they understand your brilliance? I'm sorry but, if that's the way you see things, I am afraid that the problem lies elsewhere. One tip: it's not with everyone else.
source: http://politics.sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/322192
Do you agree that if inflation rate is 7%, your property price will appreciate by 7% over the same period?
-
O o O,
Since you maths so good.
Can help me add 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ..............999,998 + 999,999?
That should keep you amused for a long time.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
1) You dont need to give excuses to use FUCKING in this forum.
2) You keep telling me that my logic is flawed and there are these potential variables. My question to you 5125, what are these potential variables you are talking? How many are there?
Contrary to what you want us to believe, I believe your arguement is logically flawed because you cant back up what you said with FACTS and you will never be able to come out with an equation that can explain how inflation can have a direct impact on property price.
Btw, if FUC KING is a function of STUPIDITY, so based on the no. of fuc king you mentioned above, can I say that you are more stupid than I am?
Conditional statement in argument....the premises has to be correct for argument to be both logically correct and ACCEPTED
Since ur premises as highlighted is wrong...ur argument even if logically correct is not accepted.
In blues....I have stated I am not here to argue about specific economic terms...
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
O o O,
Since you maths so good.
Can help me add 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ..............999,998 + 999,999?
That should keep you amused for a long time.
if he know the proper way, the answer can be solve in less than a min.
-
Originally posted by O o O:
Thats only if trash like you can ever differentiate what is trash and what is facts.Living in your little make belief world eh ?
Why do you even bother to come here and make contacts with the outside world ?
-
Originally posted by freedom4ever:
if he know the proper way, the answer can be solve in less than a min.
i know. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Back to personal attacks and repetitions.
Originally posted by O o O:
Please dont try to talk yourself up by calling other names because this sort of behavior are always linked to sore losers who are running out of facts to support his argument.I guess he just showed himself to be a sore loser yet again
-
Originally posted by 0 o 0:
Property price can be affected by many factors, it includes location, supply and demand, natural disaster, economic growth and stability, government policies etc,
While inflation on the other hand can be affected by war, market liquidity, industrial cartel, currency fluctuation, interest rate, taxation etc.
By claiming that inflation is a function of property price, you are simply showing your lack on understanding in what you are talking about.
No foundation in Economics? I think you should keep this statement for yourself instead.
U mentions other variables..."location,supply and demand, market liquidity....etc"
The statement"inflation is a function of property price,....." implies u are saying because of other factors/variables, property price cannot be A variable of inflation.
Unless the person u are rebutting use "Inflation is THE function of property price", then ur statement makes logical sense.
U cannot base on other factors and rebutt the existence of a certain factor.
I hope u understand what I am saying.
The variables u are putting in are "location, supply and demand, natural disaster, economic growth and stability, government policies etc"And u are using the existence of these variables to disprove property price as a possible potential variables.What u should do is to show cases of examples that property prices is not a variable. Not by merely showing the existence of other variables.I am not saying ur variables are wrong! But ur argument form!!It is like u saying, Tom cannot be a boy, because he wear skirts, wore lipsticks and eyelashes.Yes wear skirts, wore lipsticks and eyelashes are usually done by girls...but these are not sufficient conditions to ensure tom cannot be a boy.What u should say would be like Tom was verified as a girl infant when born. Tom was just a name given . This sufficiently shows Tom is a girl.U should stop using the F words since I have stop using them. And be more polite next time. -
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
Conditional statement in argument....the premises has to be correct for argument to be both logically correct and ACCEPTED
Since ur premises as highlighted is wrong...ur argument even if logically correct is not accepted.
In blues....I have stated I am not here to argue about specific economic terms...
5125, you mean you dont know what are the variables but you know there are potential variables? Just like trying to sell traditional medicine at Peoples Park?So am I right to say that whatever you said are only good for classroom exercise and cant be use practically because there is no way you can come out with an complete equation that explain the relationship between inflation and property price?
So based on the same principle, can I also say that many things in life and be simplified to y = f(x)? like Eagle = Mostwanted5125
-
This study analyses the inflation hedging effectiveness of residential real estate over the 1969-94 period. The results indicate that residential real estate is a significant hedge against both expected and unexpected inflation. These results indicate that since financial assets are not good inflation hedges in periods of high unexpected inflation, including real estate in a portfolio should decrease the variance of the portfolio returns. These results were made possible by the use of the Added Variable Regression Method (AVRM), a measure which has yet to be employed in this context. There are nine variables included in the AVRM framework which are also found to have significant explanatory power relative to residential real estate returns.
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
U mentions other variables..."location,supply and demand, market liquidity....etc"
The statement"inflation is a function of property price,....." implies u are saying because of other factors/variables, property price cannot be A variable of inflation.
Unless the person u are rebutting use "Inflation is THE function of property price", then ur statement makes logical sense.
U cannot base on other factors and rebutt the existence of a certain factor.
I hope u understand what I am saying.
The variables u are putting in are "location, supply and demand, natural disaster, economic growth and stability, government policies etc"And u are using the existence of these variables to disprove property price as a possible potential variables.What u should do is to show cases of examples that property prices is not a variable. Not by merely showing the existence of other variables.I am not saying ur variables are wrong! But ur argument form!!It is like u saying, Tom cannot be a boy, because he wear skirts, wore lipsticks and eyelashes.Yes wear skirts, wore lipsticks and eyelashes are usually done by girls...but these are not sufficient conditions to ensure tom cannot be a boy.What u should say would be like Tom was verified as a girl infant when born. Tom was just a name given . This sufficiently shows Tom is a girl.U should stop using the F words since I have stop using them. And be more polite next time.5125, when someone say that the property you bought for $1,400,000 with an inflation of 6.7% a year, would have been priced at $1,493,800 at the end of 1 year.
What does that imply?
-
Originally posted by O o O:
5125, you mean you dont know what are the variables but you know there are potential variables? Just like trying to sell traditional medicine at Peoples Park?So am I right to say that whatever you said are only good to classroom exercise and cant be use in practically because there is no way you can come out with an complete equation that explain the relationship between inflation and property price?
So based on the same principle, can I also say that many things in life and be simplified to y - f(x)? like Eagle = Mostwanted5125
In which part did I say I am going to derive an equilibrium for inflation and property price??
So am I right to say for someone who cant argue logically are only good at conning idiots into believing him.
I have said many times.....not about ur econs knowledge....but the way u phrase ur argument is wrong and hence cannot be use to counter Maurizio 13 point of view.
For the part in red.., It is also not simple . y-f(x) where y is the hamiltonian of an electron bounded in an flutuating potential well with V(x)= sin(x-wt). And f(x) is the least variation ofthe physical path taken by the electron.Try solving it....is it simple???? As I have said...stop disgracing urself by saying things u have little knowledge in.
I have little knowledge in econs...I admit it....I never question ur econs ability...but I am darn sure ur form of argument is wrong!!!
-
Originally posted by O o O:
5125, when someone say that the property you bought for $1,400,000 with an inflation of 6.7% a year, would have been priced at $1,493,800 at the end of 1 year.
What does that imply?
Who said that?Can you link your quote to the exact same words?
-
Originally posted by O o O:
5125, when someone say that the property you bought for $1,400,000 with an inflation of 6.7% a year, would have been priced at $1,493,800 at the end of 1 year.
What does that imply?
As I have state my stand many times....even the blind can understand them.... I am not arguing about ur knowledge in econs....
I am arguing the fact that ur previous post is wrong logically.
So are u trying to digress here by showing ur econ expertise when I have point out ur logical flaw???
Since u really want fame that much ok....i shall give it to u.....
I AM NOT AN EXPERT IN ECONS. ...happy???? but ur flaw still remain as a flaw ...regardless of how time passes.
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
In which part did I say I am going to derive an equilibrium for inflation and property price??
So am I right to say for someone who cant argue logically are only good at conning idiots into believing him.
I have said many times.....not about ur econs knowledge....but the way u phrase ur argument is wrong and hence cannot be use to counter Maurizio 13 point of view.
For the part in red.., It is also not simple . y-f(x) where y is the hamiltonian of an electron bounded in an flutuating potential well with V(x)= sin(x-wt). And f(x) is the least variation ofthe physical path taken by the electron. Try solving it....is it simple???? As I have said...stop disgracing urself by saying things u have little knowledge in.
I have little knowledge in econs...I admit it....I never question ur econs ability...but I am darn sure ur form of argument is wrong!!!Dude.. don't get so work up over this one.
His econs also sucks.. his knowledge about property is only limited to the tiny red dot.
You're just arguing with a primary school kid....
-
Originally posted by Mostwanted5125:
As I have state my stand many times....even the blind can understand them.... I am not arguing about ur knowledge in econs....
I am arguing the fact that ur previous post is wrong logically.
So are u trying to digress here by showing ur econ expertise when I have point out ur logical flaw???
Since u really want fame that much ok....i shall give it to u.....
I AM NOT AN EXPERT IN ECONS. ...happy???? but ur flaw still remain as a flaw ...regardless of how time passes.
5125, please dont get so defensive, what I am asking you is does that statement imply that "Inflation is THE function of property price"
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Who said that?Can you link your quote to the exact same words?
You must be out of your fucking mind to ask me that question.