Geylang Serai market is run by PAP Kampong Ubi CCC!!
-
double
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
You know the old uncle like to repeat themselves many many time one? it's like they are insane, but actually it is just that they forgot they already said it before, super short term memory.What a stupid idiot that cannot even read properly.... what repeat?
The proof that you are an idiot?
1.
Is the country's economy being destroyed by cronyism and nepotism of the cursed despot and the cronyism of his relatives and cronies?
It was obvious since 2007 .....
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:A bit of history lesson....
July 2007
BTW you people know that the market crashed today? [page: 1, 2, 3,... 25, 26, 27]
November 2007
Looks like its getting really serious.... [page: 1, 2, 3,... 42, 43, 44]
Jan 2008
It no longer just Looks like its getting really serious..... [page: 1, 2, 3,... 13, 14, 15]2.
Is the country's economy being destroyed by cronyism and nepotism of the cursed despot and the cronyism of his relatives and cronies?
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:The damned despots are destroying the economy with their greed and take as much money from the people as possible policies.....
Singapore Economy Shrinks by Record Margin
Wall Street Journal - 17 hours agoBy TOM WRIGHT and COSTAS PARIS SINGAPORE -- Singapore's economy shrunk by its largest-ever margin in the first quarter as demand for its exports cratered, ...When the economy was good, they claimed credit and when the economy turned bad, they said it was "global problems"
Damned cursed despots and their propaganda.
3.
Is the country's economy being destroyed by cronyism and nepotism of the cursed despot and the cronyism of his relatives and cronies?
Moody's revises rating outlooks for DBS, OCBC and UOB to negative
The Asian Banker (subscription) - 56 minutes agoSingapore, the most important market by far for these three banks, has been in recession since the second half of last year. The country's economy is ... -
The stupid idiot is too silly to see that they are three different examples of the point.
-
Originally posted by angel7030:
No!! NEA will said, "Your Honor, we had checked the owner of the Indian Rojak out, he voted for the opposition in the previous election, for this, we had no more case, the prosecutor rest, thank you your honor"
I guess to remind everyone what an insanely delusional ass you are, once a page, is adequate:
"After all, I am an Angel of God" 05 Feb `09, 6:04PM
"for God, Angel, on behalf of Gabriel" 16 Apr `09, 10:42AM
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
I guess to remind everyone what an insanely delusional ass you are, once a page, is adequate:
"After all, I am an Angel of God" 05 Feb `09, 6:04PM
"for God, Angel, on behalf of Gabriel" 16 Apr `09, 10:42AM
this... is the repeat. -
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Is the country's economy being destroyed by cronyism and nepotism of the cursed despot and the cronyism of his relatives and cronies?
Unless you are from planet insane, the stuff in red is a repeat. Why do you even want to dispute that? hai... nevermind, go on repeating bah, i don't blame you.
-
lol
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
Unless you are from planet insane, the stuff in red is a repeat. Why do you even want to dispute that? hai... nevermind, go on repeating bah, i don't blame you.
Of course that is a repeat. Are you too stupid to know why it is repeated? The information below it, which is different, refers to the same header.
Why don't you complain that people are repeating the same letters of the alphabets?
Have you gone insanely delusional like your insane angelic lover?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Of course that is a repeat. Are you too stupid to know why it is repeated? The information below it, which is different, refers to the same header.
Why don't you complain that people are repeating the same letters of the alphabets?
Have you gone insanely delusional like your insane angelic lover?
haha, complaining people using the same letter of the alphabet? i wonder how your brain functions to link to that.
you need a header? on a forum? ok, carry on than. i am not the forum police, not going to nag to you about using 3 post when 1 is obviously enough.
also, i realised you don't like people who stalk, do personal attacks, or say things without backing it up? I give you a chance to prove that you are not what you hate, prove your statement, which i will repost it below.
Have you gone insanely delusional like your insane angelic lover?
Of course, you can just admit that you are a stalker,who like to do personal attacks, and say things that you cannot back up if you can't do it. I won't blame you.
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, complaining people using the same letter of the alphabet? i wonder how your brain functions to link to that.
you need a header? on a forum? ok, carry on than. i am not the forum police, not going to nag to you about using 3 post when 1 is obviously enough.
also, i realised you don't like people who stalk, do personal attacks, or say things without backing it up? I give you a chance to prove that you are not what you hate, prove your statement, which i will repost it below.
Have you gone insanely delusional like your insane angelic lover?
Of course, you can just admit that you are a stalker,who like to do personal attacks, and say things that you cannot back up if you can't do it. I won't blame you.
Again, talk cock sing song, make wild claims, without any proof and evidence... you and your insanely delusional lover are a good match!
...forgot to add "angelic"
you and your insanely delusional "angelic" lover are a good match!
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Again, talk cock sing song, make wild claims, without any proof and evidence... you and your insanely delusional lover are a good match!
...forgot to add "angelic"
you and your insanely delusional "angelic" lover are a good match!
haha, so you can't prove that statement? ok, i accept that you make statements without the ability to back it up than.
I see you have made another statement about me "making wild claims". are you able to back up that one? but i doubt you will do so, since you are already a proven talk cock king.
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, so you can't prove that statement? ok, i accept that you make statements without the ability to back it up than.
I see you have made another statement about me "making wild claims". are you able to back up that one? but i doubt you will do so, since you are already a proven talk cock king.
You said I stalk you but you cannot provide any proof and evidence and instead you want me to provide proof and evidence? hahahahaha.... You are a first class idiot. Like that anyone can claim that you are farking your angelic insane lover in the asshole and you are supposed to provide proof that you are not?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You said I stalk you but you cannot provide any proof and evidence and instead you want me to provide proof and evidence? hahahahaha.... You are a first class idiot. Like that anyone can claim that you are farking your angelic insane lover in the asshole and you are supposed to provide proof that you are not?
haha, wild claim number 1: "you said i stalk you"
did i say you stalked me? Wrong.
Hence, the rest of your post is irrelevant.
try again.
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, wild claim number 1: "you said i stalk you"
did i say you stalked me? Wrong.
Hence, the rest of your post is irrelevant.
try again.
Are you an insanely delusional idiot or are you a liar that that do notr know what you wrote? You did not write this?
"Of course, you can just admit that you are a stalker,"
So which are you?
an insanely delusional idiot
or
an insanely delusional liar
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Are you an insanely delusional idiot or are you a liar that that do notr know what you wrote? You did not write this?
"Of course, you can just admit that you are a stalker,"
So which are you?
an insanely delusional idiot
or
an insanely delusional liar
haha, the thing you quoted emphasis the fact that i said "you are a stalker" , which part of it contains the meaning "you are stalking me?" hai, so simple logic... real idiot.
The one you stalk is angel loh. just look back in your last, 100 posts perhaps? all the out of nowhere personal attacks and stalking...
I am not the defender of justice of sgforums, so i can't bring you to sgforums jail for being a stalker, making wild claims or making personal attacks. I accept you just the way you are, don't worry, it's ok.
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, the thing you quoted emphasis the fact that i said "you are a stalker" , which part of it contains the meaning "you are stalking me?" hai, so simple logic... real idiot.
The one you stalk is angel loh. just look back in your last, 100 posts perhaps? all the out of nowhere personal attacks and stalking...
I am not the defender of justice of sgforums, so i can't bring you to sgforums jail for being a stalker, making wild claims or making personal attacks. I accept you just the way you are, don't worry, it's ok.
Wow, when I reply to posts that your angelic lover makes, referring to me, it is Stalking? OMG What an idiot!!!
When your angelic lover posts replies to my posts not directed at her, she is not stalking?
OMG what an idiot!!!!
You are defending her because she lets you fark her asshole?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Wow, when I reply to posts that your angelic lover makes, referring to me, it is Stalking? OMG What an idiot!!!
When your angelic lover posts replies to my posts not directed at her, she is not stalking?
OMG what an idiot!!!!
You are defending her because she lets you fark her asshole?
Haha, if she refer to you, and you reply, that is not stalking. are you high? go look back your last 100 post bah, there are the ones where you stalk her out of nowhere.
wild claim number 2: "you are defending her"
haha, how am i defending her if i can not put you in sgforums jail? same exercise, come up with proof that i defend her.
Try not to make wild claims again, ok?
Nah, that is too much to ask of you. just try not to sound like an idiot
-
1 comedian n the other 1 a clown arguing over who to take responsibility
is this a comic thread?
-
Originally posted by seyKai:
1 comedian n the other 1 a clown arguing over who to take responsibility
is this a comic thread?
is who taking responsibility the topic being argued? haha...
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
Haha, if she refer to you, and you reply, that is not stalking. are you high? go look back your last 100 post bah, there are the ones where you stalk her out of nowhere.
wild claim number 2: "you are defending her"
haha, how am i defending her if i can not put you in sgforums jail? same exercise, come up with proof that i defend her.
Try not to make wild claims again, ok?
Nah, that is too much to ask of you. just try not to sound like an idiot
Again in your delusional mind, you can just suka suka make accusations: "the ones where you stalk her out of nowhere." but the accused must "go look back your last 100 post "
So, provide the evidence and while you are at it, provide evidence, according to your insane logic, that you are not farking your insane delusional angel in the asshole.
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Again in your delusional mind, you can just suka suka make accusations: "the ones where you stalk her out of nowhere." but the accused must "go look back your last 100 post "
So, provide the evidence and while you are at it, provide evidence, according to your insane logic, that you are not farking your insane delusional angel in the asshole.
haha, you want the evidence so much, i find for you loh...
http://sgforums.com/forums/1533/topics/356497
post number 25.
haha, so now your turn to prove i defend angel.
and also, by your logic, if you defend someone, that person let you fuck him/her in the ass. I don't agree to this logic, but since you think this logic is true, you must have fucked CSJ.
Or you want to prove this logic also?
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, you want the evidence so much, i find for you loh...
http://sgforums.com/forums/1533/topics/356497
post number 25.
haha, so now your turn to prove i defend angel.
and also, by your logic, if you defend someone, that person let you fuck him/her in the ass. I don't agree to this logic, but since you think this logic is true, you must have fucked CSJ.
Or you want to prove this logic also?
You can only cite one farking post out of the so called, "go look back your last 100 post " I will not go into the circumstance that led to that post, but one farking post is called stalking? What an idiot!
You want me to prove that you are defending your angelic lover?
You did not say in your usual idiotic delusional fashion: "The one you stalk is angel loh.", here "21 Apr `09, 12:03PM" ?
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You can only cite one farking post out of the so called, "go look back your last 100 post " I will not go into the circumstance that led to that post, but one farking post is called stalking? What an idiot!
You want me to prove that you are defending your angelic lover?
You did not say in your usual idiotic delusional fashion: "The one you stalk is angel loh.", here "21 Apr `09, 12:03PM" ?
haha, are you an idiot? Your post included you monitoring her past activities to the minute detail of where and when she post, now that is effort that normal people won't go to, unless they are stalking someone. I won't go into the effort to find and link and keep a copy of another person's post, too stalkerish...
your evidence? how did i defend her. what did i defend her from? I defend her by saying she is not ugly? i defend her by saying she is not childish? try posting something... defensive.... maybe in your insane mind, the tone i said it in was more defensive, but i find it hard to imagine.
-
Originally posted by skythewood:
haha, are you an idiot? Your post included you monitoring her past activities to the minute detail of where and when she post, now that is effort that normal people won't go to, unless they are stalking someone. I won't go into the effort to find and link and keep a copy of another person's post, too stalkerish...
your evidence? how did i defend her. what did i defend her from? I defend her by saying she is not ugly? i defend her by saying she is not childish? try posting something... defensive.... maybe in your insane mind, the tone i said it in was more defensive, but i find it hard to imagine.
In your usual idiotic delusional fashion, you say "you monitoring her past activities to the minute detail of where and when she post, " without providing any evidence whatsoever that your claim is true.
Delusional idiotic liar!
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
In your usual idiotic delusional fashion, you say "you monitoring her past activities to the minute detail of where and when she post, " without providing any evidence whatsoever that your claim is true.
Delusional idiotic liar!
the evidence i provided,
http://sgforums.com/forums/1533/topics/356497
here
Words of an insane ass ....
"After all, I am an Angel of God" 05 Feb `09, 6:04PM
"for God, Angel, on behalf of Gabriel" 16 Apr `09, 10:42AM
includes links to when and where she posted the details. proven.
i think i will call it a day.... only i validating my claim while he never validates any of his is boring...